<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ickily statisticky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2005/09/23/ickily-statisticky/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2005/09/23/ickily-statisticky</link>
	<description>Pontification without all the gritty gravitas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:27:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2005/09/23/ickily-statisticky/comment-page-1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=88#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I do not teach. But I thought of a way that teaching statistics could be changed over, say, the last 25 years. Perhaps one might organize a class around resampling or bootstrap methods with simulated data. I don&#039;t know if this would lead to improved understanding by students, although I guess Julian Simon used to claim it did.

I doubt that is why there is the variation in textbooks that you have seen. But that is one option on the plate of teaching methods that probably wasn&#039;t available 25 years ago, given the computing power of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not teach. But I thought of a way that teaching statistics could be changed over, say, the last 25 years. Perhaps one might organize a class around resampling or bootstrap methods with simulated data. I don&#8217;t know if this would lead to improved understanding by students, although I guess Julian Simon used to claim it did.</p>
<p>I doubt that is why there is the variation in textbooks that you have seen. But that is one option on the plate of teaching methods that probably wasn&#8217;t available 25 years ago, given the computing power of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

