Danger: blogs

Advice to… some­body: Watch Your Back:

Blog­gers are more of a threat than peo­ple real­ize, and they are only going to get more toxic. This is the new real­ity,” says Peter Black­shaw, chief mar­ket­ing offi­cer at Intel­liseek, a Cincin­nati firm that sifts through mil­lions of blogs to pro­vide watch-​​your-​​back ser­vice to 75 clients, includ­ing Proc­ter & Gam­ble and Ford. “The poten­tial for brand dam­age is really high,” says Frank Shaw, exec­u­tive vice pres­i­dent at Microsoft’s main pub­lic rela­tions firm, Waggener Edstrom. “There is bad infor­ma­tion out there in the blog space, and you have only hours to get ahead of it and cut it off, espe­cially if it’s juicy.”

See the point, in con­text even, at The Read­ing Expe­ri­ence.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Tozier. Bookmark the permalink.

2 thoughts on “Danger: blogs

  1. Nice to know we have at least a lit­tle bit of power. I won­der if they (cor­po­ra­tions) also comb the web look­ing for sug­ges­tions on how to be more socially responsible.

  2. The inter­est­ing thing to me is the impli­ca­tion of the thread that goes, “Old-​​fashioned cen­sor­ship and intim­i­da­tion may have to do.…”

    When I tell a friend over cof­fee, “Proc­tor & Gam­ble prod­ucts kill ponies, and threaten explode the Sun”, I’m within my rights. When I pub­lish a book that says that, I’m also within my rights, isn’t it? It points out the kind of gray area that’s really really dark gray, and really really light gray to imply that blog­ging is threat­ened by being con­strained in this way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>