<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To earn my bread, at last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last</link>
	<description>Pontification without all the gritty gravitas</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Health</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=243#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>I’m imagining some kind of inferential dynamic programming where the policy is continually updated (using the incomplete information available) to reflect some local optimal policy rather than a global optimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m imagining some kind of inferential dynamic programming where the policy is continually updated (using the incomplete information available) to reflect some local optimal policy rather than a global optimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=243#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Duh! You know when you're done when you send the bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh! You know when you&#8217;re done when you send the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tozier</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tozier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=243#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Keep them on the edge of their seats, they say. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep them on the edge of their seats, they say. <img src='http://williamtozier.com/slurry/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Muldrew</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2006/01/04/to-earn-my-bread-at-last#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Muldrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=243#comment-295</guid>
		<description>"Complicated" is a lot harder than "complex", but that doesn't make complexity simple. There just aren't any good ways to analyze nonlinear systems in toto. But maybe if you are willing to build things that you cannot understand, analysis isn't needed anyway. But then, how do you know what to build (never mind when you are done)? Do we just let magic loose in the world and hope that natural selection remains kind to us as our inventions find their own quasi-optimal path in the world? 

I guess I'm really confused as to what you mean by "design". At the moment I'm imagining some kind of inferential dynamic programming where the policy is continually updated (using the incomplete information available) to reflect some local optimal policy rather than a global optimum. Probably that's not even remotely close to what you're writing about, so I'm eagerly awaiting further exposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Complicated&#8221; is a lot harder than &#8220;complex&#8221;, but that doesn&#8217;t make complexity simple. There just aren&#8217;t any good ways to analyze nonlinear systems in toto. But maybe if you are willing to build things that you cannot understand, analysis isn&#8217;t needed anyway. But then, how do you know what to build (never mind when you are done)? Do we just let magic loose in the world and hope that natural selection remains kind to us as our inventions find their own quasi-optimal path in the world? </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m really confused as to what you mean by &#8220;design&#8221;. At the moment I&#8217;m imagining some kind of inferential dynamic programming where the policy is continually updated (using the incomplete information available) to reflect some local optimal policy rather than a global optimum. Probably that&#8217;s not even remotely close to what you&#8217;re writing about, so I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting further exposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
