Wells on the difference between utterance and dialogue

Branko quotes Wells:

Of a Book Unwrit­ten

Accom­plished lit­er­a­ture is all very well in its way, no doubt, but much more fas­ci­nat­ing to the con­tem­pla­tive man are the books that have not been writ­ten. These lat­ter are no trou­ble to hold; there are no pages to turn over. One can read them in bed on sleep­less nights with­out a can­dle. Turn­ing to another topic, prim­i­tive man in the works of the descrip­tive anthro­pol­o­gist is cer­tainly a very enter­tain­ing and quaint per­son, but the man of the future, if we only had the facts, would appeal to us more strongly. Yet where are the books? As Ruskin has said some­where, à pro­pos of Dar­win, it is not what man has been, but what he will be, that should inter­est us.

What will a book be, when it has been pub­lished? Some­thing new, I think. Many peo­ple don’t seem to under­stand that. Branko, some oth­ers — they do.

Let’s see what we can do about spread­ing that understanding.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Tozier. Bookmark the permalink.

2 thoughts on “Wells on the difference between utterance and dialogue

  1. Branko was, as is not unusual with him, suf­fer­ing from brain­fuzz. Ideas kept flit­ting through his head like unruly but­ter­flies, and none could be caught and pinned to his blog.

    And so in the end I took the sly and easy way out, and let Wells do the work for me. One thought remained: “jux­ta­po­si­tion purdy” (you really need to read my entry to under­stand, as Bill quoted only half of it).

    If that means I under­stand the unwrit­ten book, there’s only one thing I can say: I rule!

    As for one of the ideas I tried to pin down with this par­tic­u­lar quote: it struck me that when Wells wrote “[unwrit­ten books] are no trou­ble to hold; there are no pages to turn over. One can read them in bed on sleep­less nights with­out a can­dle,” he could have been writ­ing about the mechan­i­cal qual­i­ties of e-​​books too.

  2. I know. But I changed the con­text, see? :)

    Small pieces, loosely joined. He was talk­ing about sev­eral things, which spark con­ver­sa­tions sub­se­quently. Like but­ter­flies refus­ing to be pinned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>