<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digitization access licensing and scholarship&#8217;s &#8220;best before&#8221; date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2007/01/25/digitization-access-licensing-and-scholarships-best-before-date/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2007/01/25/digitization-access-licensing-and-scholarships-best-before-date</link>
	<description>Pontification without all the gritty gravitas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:30:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Muldrew</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2007/01/25/digitization-access-licensing-and-scholarships-best-before-date/comment-page-1#comment-21280</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Muldrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2007/01/25/digitization-access-licensing-and-scholarships-best-before-date#comment-21280</guid>
		<description>I really hope there are some University librarians reading this who can shed some light on the matter. I got the impression that there was some triangulation between the scholars (demanding content from the library), the librarians (sending the scholars after the admin), and the administration (slashing the library budget to keep classrooms from being overcrowded). Nobody takes a long view in such circumstances, so we ended up with the unpleasant license agreements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope there are some University librarians reading this who can shed some light on the matter. I got the impression that there was some triangulation between the scholars (demanding content from the library), the librarians (sending the scholars after the admin), and the administration (slashing the library budget to keep classrooms from being overcrowded). Nobody takes a long view in such circumstances, so we ended up with the unpleasant license agreements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
