September 17, 2007 at 2:23 am · Filed under Uncategorized
September 15, 2007 at 2:26 am · Filed under Uncategorized
September 14, 2007 at 2:23 am · Filed under Uncategorized
September 12, 2007 at 2:24 am · Filed under Uncategorized
-
A bit rough, but, “Information that stops at a given individual helps no one. The Agile Manager should design social media systems to churn any information received during a project.”
-
Big damned batteries
-
Big damned batteries
-
-
“The Quadra 700 could be upgraded to 68 megabytes of RAM, which with its 25 MHz processor made it a very useful computer for scientific or design work” One in my garage…
September 11, 2007 at 2:24 am · Filed under Uncategorized
-
-
-
Wishing. Just wishing. For the office.
-
“Agile teams are at the forefront of a movement. But the front lines are the bloody lines. We’re going to get knocked around a little.”
-
“The firm figured that they’d do what they could within the strict terms of the initial contract and then pick up extra time through massive overestimation on change requests.”
-
September 10, 2007 at 2:23 am · Filed under Uncategorized
-
Particularly like this version of “The Look of Love”
-
“Facebook helps us play around, but it doesn’t help us really communicate.”
-
“Those bad assets will have to move to banks’ balance sheets… But putting them there requires huge amounts of cash.”
-
Via apostropher (http://www.apostropher.com/blog/archives/003920.html)
-
“Sam Zell is widely regarded as one of the savviest value investors around. The fact that Zell, an old hand in real estate, was cashing out was widely seen as the sign of a market top.”
-
-
-
September 9, 2007 at 9:48 am · Filed under Uncategorized
From an actual, yes I sent it email:
Hi ██████. Just going to ask for some clarification on a couple of things, OK?
Check me on some facts. This is how I have them in my notes, and I want to make sure I get them right:
- Buyer listed 29 ac at $██k/acre
- I called, and you quoted me $███k/ac for 7 ac, about 50% surcharge, which the seller thought would offset “loss of street access on one side.”
- I checked comps for wooded, bare farm, and developed land, sold and selling, and suggest $██k/ac is reasonable, or in other words about a 10% premium above asking price, because seller is indeed losing some street access on one side.
- Seller comes back with a suggestion that I pay net $███k/ac, or 10% higher than his first 50% inflated suggestion…
- …for substantially less land.
I think maybe I missed a decimal somewhere. Or something.
September 8, 2007 at 2:22 am · Filed under Uncategorized
September 6, 2007 at 2:25 am · Filed under Uncategorized
September 4, 2007 at 2:28 am · Filed under Uncategorized