Not An Employee

One of the rea­sons it’s been rel­a­tively quiet here in the last few months is that I’ve been work­ing on sev­eral projects. Not secret, as such; just the oppo­site in fact. But one doesn’t want to sub­ject the world to half-​​formed notions.

The first real project went out the door today:

Not An Employee

With Laura Fisher, Bar­bara Tozier, and Brian Kerr, we’ve made… some­thing. We’ll see what it is, what it becomes.

Like many things these days, many things I’ve got my fin­gers in, many of the but­tons I push, it may sound like a joke. It is; it was. And it’s not.

Who are you? And who do you serve?

Just what is it that you do?

Just who do you think Citibank is targeting with dunning notices?

My Mom is 84 years old, lives with us. She’s finan­cially secure, to the point where we try furi­ously to make enough char­i­ta­ble dona­tions at the end of the year to make a dent in her taxes. This year we used her Citibank credit card to make most of those donations.

When I paid the bill a few weeks back, the check appar­ently dis­ap­peared in the mail. Four (4) days after the bill was due, they started calling.

Five times in the last week, some­body stern from Citi Card Ser­vices has called to talk with my 84-​​year-​​old Mom about her over­due account. When will she pay it? Will she pay it online? Why won’t she take the few min­utes to set up an online bank­ing account and pay it online? Well OK, has she already sent the check? What was the check num­ber? In what amount? Do you know there will be seri­ous con­se­quences if pay­ment is not received?

Yeah — there surely will. You, my dear Citi Card Ser­vices per­son, will inad­ver­tently dis­close some­thing that the screen of “cus­tomer pri­vacy” no doubt hides quite hand­ily from the inquis­i­tive pub­lic: The same exact actu­ar­ial risk analy­sis algo­rithms used to deter­mine who is a good or poor can­di­date for credit cards? Those can be used to deter­mine who will panic and send dupli­cate funds, over­pay their bills, get dropped off the cus­tomer rolls, get purged.

Not only could one pre­dict with some cer­tainty who is a good or bad risk as a con­tin­u­ing client. One could also pre­dict — and per­haps with bet­ter accu­racy, given inter­nal his­tor­i­cal records — which cus­tomer resources you can burn to bal­ance the books. You don’t want to irri­tate those twenty-​​something over­spenders; you want to kick out the lit­tle old ladies who pay their bills down to zero, the folks with “good” credit records. Kick ‘em off the lists, and move onto the big spenders.

But you know, from out here in the con­sumer side of things, I have to won­der how the pub­lic might per­ceive that. Most lit­tle old ladies, my Mom included, main­tain one credit card so they have any credit rat­ing at all. Some­thing bad hap­pens to it, and she’s out of luck. All per­ma­nent record neg­a­tive con­se­quences that a young twenty-​​something spend­thrift is buffered from by jug­gling accounts and rolling them over? Your typ­i­cal retiree widow will have no pro­tec­tion against.

I’m not sure how the pub­lic might per­ceive that at all.

links for 2008-​​02-​​27