<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There are exactly two ways: one, and many</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many</link>
	<description>Pontification without all the gritty gravitas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P2P Metaphysics: One, None, and the Many</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-54352</link>
		<dc:creator>P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P2P Metaphysics: One, None, and the Many</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-54352</guid>
		<description>[...] by William Tozier&#8217;s meditation above, which is an argument for generalist practice and knowledge as against hyper-specialisation, our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] by William Tozier’s meditation above, which is an argument for generalist practice and knowledge as against hyper-specialisation, our […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Natural Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BLOG What is the Name That is Big Enough to Hold Your Life?</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-53859</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Natural Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BLOG What is the Name That is Big Enough to Hold Your Life?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-53859</guid>
		<description>[...] Tozier&#8217;s wonderful post last year (&#8221;I do&#8230; this&#8220;) on the virtues of being a generalist might make us think that this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Tozier’s wonderful post last year (”I do… this“) on the virtues of being a generalist might make us think that this […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notional Slurry &#187; Hot hits: How &#8220;productivity&#8221; kills</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-53850</link>
		<dc:creator>Notional Slurry &#187; Hot hits: How &#8220;productivity&#8221; kills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-53850</guid>
		<description>[...] Pollard was kind enough to speak flatteringly about my 2008 rant on generalism, distraction, and fulfillment in a productivity-driven world of specialis... A number of folks have come along looking for it; here&#8217;s a copy: There are two ways to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Pollard was kind enough to speak flatteringly about my 2008 rant on generalism, distraction, and fulfillment in a productivity-driven world of specialis… A number of folks have come along looking for it; here’s a copy: There are two ways to […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collective Wisdom (Initiative) - Responses &#171; Beyond Rivalry</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-53749</link>
		<dc:creator>Collective Wisdom (Initiative) - Responses &#171; Beyond Rivalry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-53749</guid>
		<description>[...] This essay, &#8220;There are exactly two ways: one, and many&#8221; (not on the CWI website) by Bill at Notional Slurry, interests me, though I don&#8217;t know who I am in it. He seems to say that longitudinal being is related to &#8220;the Life of the Mind,&#8221; which is &#8220;the cultivated ability to span boundaries, cross borders of disciplines, bring what you’ve learned over there to bear over here. &#8230; [It] is merely acting on the belief that what we see around us fits together.&#8221;  He also says that the things that we see, that we notice, are of use, which in the ordinary sense of the word &#8216;use&#8221; I don&#8217;t see as true. What attracts me, what I notice, is what seems to be not of use, except that it&#8217;s what it is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This essay, “There are exactly two ways: one, and many” (not on the CWI website) by Bill at Notional Slurry, interests me, though I don’t know who I am in it. He seems to say that longitudinal being is related to “the Life of the Mind,” which is “the cultivated ability to span boundaries, cross borders of disciplines, bring what you’ve learned over there to bear over here. … [It] is merely acting on the belief that what we see around us fits together.”  He also says that the things that we see, that we notice, are of use, which in the ordinary sense of the word ‘use” I don’t see as true. What attracts me, what I notice, is what seems to be not of use, except that it’s what it is. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malvasia bianca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the dip</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-52310</link>
		<dc:creator>malvasia bianca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the dip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-52310</guid>
		<description>[...] pursuing the ideas in it very far is what&#8217;s right for me. (On which note, I&#8217;ll point to Willam Tozier&#8217;s paean to generalists, to distraction, to following your nose; see also the Not An Employee blog.) It&#8217;s probably time again to think about what is right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] pursuing the ideas in it very far is what’s right for me. (On which note, I’ll point to Willam Tozier’s paean to generalists, to distraction, to following your nose; see also the Not An Employee blog.) It’s probably time again to think about what is right […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Rose</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-52256</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-52256</guid>
		<description>One of the things that I thought about while reading your excellent, post above is that, for more and more of us to effectively do *this*, it turns out that we need each other, more than anything else. 

All of those people who want us to think we need to be specialsts have to convince us of this, if they are ever to control us. And that is what they need: control. At the beginning of the last century, it was decided that society could become near-perfect, if it became highly ordered, with everyone in their place, working on keeping things nice and ordered.

This is breaking down in reality. In real life, if you really stand back and look at it, it takes more energy, more time, more forcing and pushing, whip cracking and mutual/-self psychological mutilation to have everyone specialize.

The path of *least resistance* is to generalize. Before Mass Industrialization, I contend that people knew this, and applied it directly.  I think that upon the emergence of Mass Industry, that for a brief period, abundant, but depletable resources made it possible for people who controlled those resources to force us all to specialize. But, once those resources started to dwindle, we were told that we are on our own to replace those things that came cheap, easy, and mass produced. Naturally, people start to follow the path of least resistance, to become an adaptive generalist. But, there is litte infrastrucutre, little support for the generalist. Our systems are set up for the specialist, as you discuss in your article above.

This is what I am interested in. Part of what I am concentrating on these days. *It&#039;s up to us to plant thesseds and grow this dynamic societal infrastructure for generalists.* If we can make a better choice, people will likely choose it.  People need generalist-centric alternative ways to solve their basic survival problems.  We need new ways to &quot;bank&quot;, new ways to grow food, make the things we want and need, research and develop new things, better insights on how to work together as generalists. 

This is what I fantasized all of you folks in Ann Arbor might be interested in trying to do. Not an employee is actually a good start, though. It&#039;s a great start. But we need more. Generalists need to know they are not alone, and that if they work together, they can co-create an alternative infrastructure.  They can also learn from the past, from the last time(s) that social systems were hijacked and and reformed like a Victorian Garden into the vision of a few people. Figure out how to keep certain resources voluntarily co-governed, commonly available, and immediately useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that I thought about while reading your excellent, post above is that, for more and more of us to effectively do *this*, it turns out that we need each other, more than anything else. </p>
<p>All of those people who want us to think we need to be specialsts have to convince us of this, if they are ever to control us. And that is what they need: control. At the beginning of the last century, it was decided that society could become near-perfect, if it became highly ordered, with everyone in their place, working on keeping things nice and ordered.</p>
<p>This is breaking down in reality. In real life, if you really stand back and look at it, it takes more energy, more time, more forcing and pushing, whip cracking and mutual/-self psychological mutilation to have everyone specialize.</p>
<p>The path of *least resistance* is to generalize. Before Mass Industrialization, I contend that people knew this, and applied it directly.  I think that upon the emergence of Mass Industry, that for a brief period, abundant, but depletable resources made it possible for people who controlled those resources to force us all to specialize. But, once those resources started to dwindle, we were told that we are on our own to replace those things that came cheap, easy, and mass produced. Naturally, people start to follow the path of least resistance, to become an adaptive generalist. But, there is litte infrastrucutre, little support for the generalist. Our systems are set up for the specialist, as you discuss in your article above.</p>
<p>This is what I am interested in. Part of what I am concentrating on these days. *It’s up to us to plant thesseds and grow this dynamic societal infrastructure for generalists.* If we can make a better choice, people will likely choose it.  People need generalist-centric alternative ways to solve their basic survival problems.  We need new ways to “bank”, new ways to grow food, make the things we want and need, research and develop new things, better insights on how to work together as generalists. </p>
<p>This is what I fantasized all of you folks in Ann Arbor might be interested in trying to do. Not an employee is actually a good start, though. It’s a great start. But we need more. Generalists need to know they are not alone, and that if they work together, they can co-create an alternative infrastructure.  They can also learn from the past, from the last time(s) that social systems were hijacked and and reformed like a Victorian Garden into the vision of a few people. Figure out how to keep certain resources voluntarily co-governed, commonly available, and immediately useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notional Slurry &#187; Assumptions are not your friends</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many/comment-page-1#comment-52252</link>
		<dc:creator>Notional Slurry &#187; Assumptions are not your friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/03/03/there-are-exactly-two-ways-one-and-many#comment-52252</guid>
		<description>[...] What are you? Not an employee. What do you do? This. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] What are you? Not an employee. What do you do? This. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

