<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One more niggling, brief concern on &#8220;human scale&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale</link>
	<description>Pontification without all the gritty gravitas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:16:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tozier</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale/comment-page-1#comment-52431</link>
		<dc:creator>Tozier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=1261#comment-52431</guid>
		<description>That sounds good to me, Ed. Radioactive, but rapidly decaying. Good for the long perspective. Always coming up in discussions of history, archaeology.

C14 works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds good to me, Ed. Radioactive, but rapidly decaying. Good for the long perspective. Always coming up in discussions of history, archaeology.</p>
<p>C14 works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Vielmetti</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale/comment-page-1#comment-52430</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Vielmetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=1261#comment-52430</guid>
		<description>those also serve who sit and surf?

my typical problem with surfing is figuring out how to avoid reloading kottke all the time.  

tonight&#039;s effort, such as it was, is to use Google Spreadsheet as an organizing tool for the &quot;what&#039;s next to look at&quot; function, with a geographical ordering of sites so that people in the same place clump together.   Bill, you&#039;re C14.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those also serve who sit and surf?</p>
<p>my typical problem with surfing is figuring out how to avoid reloading kottke all the time.  </p>
<p>tonight&#8217;s effort, such as it was, is to use Google Spreadsheet as an organizing tool for the &#8220;what&#8217;s next to look at&#8221; function, with a geographical ordering of sites so that people in the same place clump together.   Bill, you&#8217;re C14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tozier</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale/comment-page-1#comment-52429</link>
		<dc:creator>Tozier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=1261#comment-52429</guid>
		<description>We all do it. Any time something is labeled pathological, even though we all do it, that&#039;s a good time for skepticism. About the label, not the thing itself.

I think what I&#039;m arguing against is underestimating &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt;, or anybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all do it. Any time something is labeled pathological, even though we all do it, that&#8217;s a good time for skepticism. About the label, not the thing itself.</p>
<p>I think what I&#8217;m arguing against is underestimating <i>anything</i>, or anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britta</title>
		<link>http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/05/31/one-more-niggling-brief-concern-on-human-scale/comment-page-1#comment-52428</link>
		<dc:creator>britta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamtozier.com/slurry/?p=1261#comment-52428</guid>
		<description>The post &quot;r/K selection and cultural dynamics&quot; seems to have its comments off? I&#039;ll post here instead.

I have a lot of fun reading these posts, but one thing stands out to me. &quot;Sitting on your ass surfing&quot; shouldn&#039;t be underestimated. I can&#039;t make things without consuming something or other first. Surfing is where a lot of the good work grows from: bookmarks and conversations, occasional blog posts, sometimes prints on analog lettepresses. Maybe you mean the empty surf process, the mindless one where a person refreshes Kottke four times a day and then checks her email again, but that&#039;s just low-quality surfing and it isn&#039;t completely bad either.

Part of what I like about the Nasty Nets Internet Surfing Club (and other net art) is that it argues, in its own particular way, that surfing is valuable and worth close inspection. Of course, it argues this by producing something out of it.

And heh, surfing my network&#039;s gang signs on Facebook is a vital part of my community-building process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post &#8220;r/K selection and cultural dynamics&#8221; seems to have its comments off? I&#8217;ll post here instead.</p>
<p>I have a lot of fun reading these posts, but one thing stands out to me. &#8220;Sitting on your ass surfing&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be underestimated. I can&#8217;t make things without consuming something or other first. Surfing is where a lot of the good work grows from: bookmarks and conversations, occasional blog posts, sometimes prints on analog lettepresses. Maybe you mean the empty surf process, the mindless one where a person refreshes Kottke four times a day and then checks her email again, but that&#8217;s just low-quality surfing and it isn&#8217;t completely bad either.</p>
<p>Part of what I like about the Nasty Nets Internet Surfing Club (and other net art) is that it argues, in its own particular way, that surfing is valuable and worth close inspection. Of course, it argues this by producing something out of it.</p>
<p>And heh, surfing my network&#8217;s gang signs on Facebook is a vital part of my community-building process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
