"Another common thread in the grad students’ stories was dissuasion, both passive and active, from engagement with the digital. From bureaucratic hassles to tepid advising to being actually barred from computing facilities built for faculty (think about that for a moment; it’s appalling on so very many levels), the message goes out loud and clear: technology is a toy, it’s a diversion, it’s fine for the classroom, but it’s not how you do your work."

"So why is Linux everywhere, and we only hear about 386BSD in historical contexts? There is exactly one answer, and it's what Eric Raymond was really talking about in The Cathedral and the Bazaar. TCatB has been seen mostly as an argument for open-source versus commercial software, but what Raymond saw was that the real competition comes down to an open contribution model versus closed contributions. Linus' promiscuous contribution policy simply let Linux out-evolve 386BSD. More contributors meant more drivers, more bug fixes, more enhancements… more ideas, ultimately. Two people, no matter how talented, cannot outcode thousands of Linux contributors. The best programmers are 10 times more productive than the average, and I would rate Bill and Lynne among the very best. But, as of last April, the Linux Foundation reported that more than 3,600 people had contributed to the kernel alone."

"Architects, designers, and developers of corporate systems usually have little or no voice in what gets built, or how, or why. (Imagine the average IT department meeting where one developer says this system really ought to be built using Scala and Lift.) The don't sign on, they get assigned. I know that individual developers do care passionately about their work, but usually have no way to really make a difference.

The net result is that corporate software is software that nobody gives a shit about: not it's creators, not it's investors, and not it's users."

"But alas, it does not. In fact and here is the crucial point, tenure doesn’t enable academic freedom, there is no such thing as academic freedom, what tenure does is farm the decision of academic freedom out to other bodies. A majority of institutions make tenure decisions based on publishing record, in other words forces outside the institution which are making market decisions based on what can be profitably sold as an intellectual commodity (usually in book form) are deciding what academics can and cannot say."

"Fortunately, we are not yet “perfected” consumers but if we are not vigilant, our attention span will continue to shrink, and those available conveniences that help us force more and more material through our tiny pinhole of focus will proliferate. (Just as road-building worsens traffic problems, media-management and organization tools tend to exacerbate our attention problems. Hence, I spend as much time editing metadata as I do concentrating on music I’m listening to.)"