Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

  • Sell­ing the Idea of a Chris­t­ian Nation: David Barton’s Alter­nate Intel­lec­tual Uni­verse | Pol­i­tics | Reli­gion Dispatches

    “I use the term “debate” in quotes because it is fraud­u­lent. Even advo­cates of the view­point of the “god­less Con­sti­tu­tion” (such as his­to­ri­ans Isaac Kram­nick and R. Lau­rence Moore) fully under­stand the reli­gious base of Amer­i­can his­tory. They sug­gest sim­ply (as Jon Stew­art was try­ing to get at) that the framers rather delib­er­ately excluded reli­gion, not because they sought an exclu­sion of reli­gion from the pub­lic square, but sim­ply to avoid any spe­cial priv­i­leges for it at the fed­eral level. Even­tu­ally, those views were incor­po­rated into state laws through the 14th Amend­ment, through the plu­ral­iza­tion of Amer­i­can life in the twen­ti­eth cen­tury, and through the epochal court cases of the 1940s through the 1970s. The Chris­t­ian Nation “debate” is not really an intel­lec­tual con­test between legit­i­mate con­tend­ing view­points. Instead, it is a man­u­fac­tured “con­tro­versy” akin to the global warm­ing “debate.” On one side are pur­vey­ors of a rich and com­plex view of the past, includ­ing most his­to­ri­ans who have writ­ten and debated fiercely about the found­ing era. The “other side” is a group of ide­o­log­i­cal entre­pre­neurs who have cre­ated an alter­nate intel­lec­tual uni­verse based on a his­tor­i­cal fun­da­men­tal­ism. In their drive to cre­ate a usable past, they show lit­tle respect for the past as a for­eign country. ”

    Chris­tian­ity con­ser­vatism history-​​is-​​a-​​feature-​​not-​​a-​​bug sto­ry­telling
  • Poor Mojo’s Newswire: Twit­pic qui­etly changes Terms of Ser­vice, they can now sell any pic you upload

    “You retain all own­er­ship rights to Con­tent uploaded to Twit­pic. How­ever, by sub­mit­ting Con­tent to Twit­pic, you hereby grant Twit­pic a world­wide, non-​​exclusive, royalty-​​free, sub­li­censeable and trans­fer­able license to use, repro­duce, dis­trib­ute, pre­pare deriv­a­tive works of, dis­play, and per­form the Con­tent in con­nec­tion with the Ser­vice and Twitpic’s (and its suc­ces­sors’ and affil­i­ates’) busi­ness, includ­ing with­out lim­i­ta­tion for pro­mot­ing and redis­trib­ut­ing part or all of the Ser­vice (and deriv­a­tive works thereof) in any media for­mats and through any media channels.”

    Twit­ter intellectual-​​property EULA licens­ing
  • Trade Secrets and Pub­lished Patent Appli­ca­tions — Patent Law Blog (Patently-​​O)

    “Patent Pub­li­ca­tion Elim­i­nates Trade Secret: In a straight­for­ward opin­ion, the appel­late panel held once pub­lished, the infor­ma­tion in a patent appli­ca­tion should be con­sid­ered “gen­er­ally known and read­ily avail­able” and there­fore are no longer amenable to trade secret protection.  ”

    patents intellectual-​​property lawyers nondis­clo­sure

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

  • Explo­ration Through Exam­ple » Blog Archive » Busi­ness value as a bound­ary object

    “The prod­uct owner is break­ing the tacit agree­ment that a bound­ary object requires. Not only must the team jus­tify their request, not only must they jus­tify it in terms of busi­ness value, they must also adopt the prod­uct owner’s def­i­n­i­tion of busi­ness value. This, I think, is an act of, well, cul­tural impe­ri­al­ism. Not only must we be use­ful and pro­duc­tive, we must be use­ful and pro­duc­tive for the right rea­sons. Not only must we do the right thing, we must believe the right way. This insis­tence on good­think is related to the scorn toward the stance of reac­tion I claimed ear­lier. The team can­not be a black box oper­at­ing accord­ing to its own rules; it must have a vis­i­ble inte­rior that oper­ates cor­rectly. I’ve done pre­cious lit­tle read­ing in colo­nial­ism, but all this reminds me of the atti­tude of colo­nial­ist rulers towards the col­o­nized: they must be remade. For that rea­son, I think learn­ing about the strate­gies the col­o­nized used to pre­serve their cul­ture might be use­ful to us in Agile.”

    agile gift-​​economy cultural-​​dynamics impe­ri­al­ism philosophy-​​of-​​engineering teams
  • Rea­sons to be cheer­ful, Part I — Crooked Timber

    “In my view, even the long-​​run esti­mates are too low. A sus­tained upward trend in prices will induce the devel­op­ment of energy-​​saving inno­va­tions (the reverse is true – when energy is cheap and get­ting cheaper, peo­ple invent new ways to use more of it). I sus­pect that the full long-​​run elas­tic­ity, includ­ing induced inno­va­tion, is near 1, mean­ing that if cur­rent real prices are sus­tained, con­sump­tion could fall as much as 70 per cent below the level that would be expected if prices had remained at the 2000 level.”

    peak-​​everything eco­nom­ics energy sus­tain­abil­ity cultural-​​dynamics
  • Pri­vate non­profit foun­da­tions & Pub­lic Health: Poten­tial con­flicts of inter­est in cor­po­rate links « Biofortified

    “They leave us with some strong state­ments and sug­ges­tions: A pri­vate foun­da­tion clearly has the legal right to spend money how­ever it wishes within the lim­its of the law; yet, in an envi­ron­ment where pri­vate foun­da­tions influ­ence the future direc­tion of, for exam­ple, what pro­grams will be intro­duced into a for­eign com­mu­nity, in a man­ner that does not nec­es­sar­ily involve direc­tor­ship or vot­ing from the com­mu­nity mem­bers them­selves, it is rea­son­able to sub­ject the decision-​​making processes of these enti­ties to pub­lic debate, espe­cially if these funds were to have oth­er­wise been col­lected for pub­lic redis­tri­b­u­tion through fed­eral taxation.”

    non­profit conflict-​​of-​​interest network-​​theory social-​​networks gov­er­nance law pro­pri­ety
  • The quants and the poets « The Dark Moun­tain Project

    “The fric­tion between the quant and the poet could be rep­re­sented by focus­ing on a few bick­er­ing indi­vid­u­als, or by try­ing to divide the greens up into Two Cul­tures. But it could also, per­haps more hon­estly and pro­duc­tively, be rep­re­sented as a ten­sion that is present within all. None of us is wholly, or even pri­mar­ily, ratio­nal and ana­lyt­i­cal, and none of us is quite devoid of poetry either, though it is some­times hard to find it. These divi­sions are them­selves sto­ries that we, in this par­tic­u­lar cul­ture, tell our­selves about how humans work. The quants and the poets are both needed, but I would argue that, right now, the poets ought to take the lead – if indeed that is ever some­thing that poets are capa­ble of. We have no short­age of argu­ments about num­bers and machines, but we do have a great short­age of work­able sto­ries. That is to say: sto­ries that don’t just have happy end­ings, but have con­vinc­ing plots as well.”

    pol­i­tics pragmatism-it-ain’t Green-​​movement sus­tain­abil­ity schism activism
  • Grow­ing need for data heads

    “I’ve said it before, but if dig­ging into data is your idea of fun, there’s a whole mess of excite­ment and adven­ture headed your way. There are lots of oppor­tu­ni­ties already out there in mar­ket­ing, jour­nal­ism, tech, the Web, gov­ern­ment, and pretty much every­where you look. And more impor­tantly, there are lots of oppor­tu­ni­ties that you can make for your­self. This is a great time for data heads.”

    data-​​science data-​​mining sta­tis­tics jobs advice