Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

  • Schum­peter: Rules for fools | The Economist

    “…Florida’s leg­is­la­ture recently debated a bill to remove licens­ing require­ments from 20 occu­pa­tions, includ­ing hair-​​braiding, inte­rior design and teach­ing ballroom-​​dancing. For a while it looked as if the bill would sail through: Florida has been a cen­tre of tea-​​party agi­ta­tion and both cham­bers have Repub­li­can majori­ties. But the peo­ple who care most about this issue—the car­tels of incumbents—lobbied the loud­est. One pre­dicted that unli­censed design­ers would use fab­rics that might spread dis­ease and cause 88,000 deaths a year. Another sug­gested, even more alarm­ingly, that clash­ing colour schemes might adversely affect “sali­va­tion”. In the early hours of May 7th the bill was defeated. If Repub­li­can majori­ties can­not pluck up the courage to chal­lenge a car­tel of inte­rior design­ers when Florida’s unem­ploy­ment rate is more than 10%, what hope has Amer­ica? The Licence Raj may be here to stay.”

    reg­u­la­tion via:arsyed disintermediation-​​targets direct-​​action-​​targets license-​​raj public-​​policy cre­den­tial­ing

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

Items of some interest…

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

  • What’s at Stake in the Geor­gia State Copy­right Case — The Chron­i­cle Review — The Chron­i­cle of Higher Education

    “As it becomes clear that the three pub­lish­ers who have ini­ti­ated the law­suit in search of higher prof­its are will­ing to attack the very heart of the sys­tem by which schol­ars live, aca­d­e­mic authors will rightly feel betrayed. The plain­tiffs are, after all, ask­ing the judge to fun­da­men­tally change the copy­right rules for higher edu­ca­tion. If the rules in the pro­posed injunc­tion were widely accepted, fair use in this field of endeavor, sup­pos­edly favored, would actu­ally be more restricted than in any other activ­ity. Yet the works at issue in the law­suit are mostly writ­ten by schol­ars for the use of other schol­ars and stu­dents. If those uses become impos­si­ble or expo­nen­tially more expen­sive, which today is the same thing, aca­d­e­mic authors will need to recon­sider whether they are receiv­ing suf­fi­cient ben­e­fits for the free labor they con­tribute to schol­arly publishing.”

    disintermediation-​​targets academic-​​culture pub­lish­ers greed-​​pays-​​dividends