Items of some interest:

These are my recent Pin​board​.in links:

  • A List Apart: Arti­cles: Artis­tic Distance

    “While I’m sure that some­one will dis­agree, these sites have proven that very few “pro­fes­sion­als” have the abil­ity or courage to pro­vide a well-​​constructed analy­sis of some­one else’s work (whether or not the eval­u­a­tion was solicited). My opin­ion has noth­ing at all to do with either web­site, but rather with indus­try pro­fes­sion­als’ inabil­ity to chal­lenge, or fear of chal­leng­ing, the sta­tus quo. Far too often, hon­esty is met with ridicule, shame, or out­right rage from peo­ple hid­ing behind elec­tronic media. As a com­mu­nity, if our goal is to con­tinue rais­ing the bar for design, we need to get to a place where objec­tive dis­cus­sion is wel­comed, not scorned or drowned in obse­quious­ness. I would love to see dis­cus­sion of basic design move past the super­fi­cial trendi­ness of emerg­ing web technologies.”

    cri­tique col­lab­o­ra­tion advice graphic-​​design not-​​just
  • - How We Will Read: Laura Miller and Maud Newton

    LM: Lit­er­ary peo­ple, when they talk about books, tend to think of fic­tion first. But most peo­ple, when they think about books, are think­ing about non­fic­tion, which lends itself amaz­ingly well to some kind of enhanced e-​​book expe­ri­ence. As a piece of that, I’m skep­ti­cal of enhanc­ing fic­tion e-​​books. The essence of nar­ra­tive is this sense of causal­ity and mean­ing, and when you intro­duce a lot of arbi­trary or ran­dom branch­ing things into it, it actu­ally loses it’s core plea­sure. It’s a tricky issue.”

    pub­lish­ing ebooks read­ing edi­tor
  • Per­sonal Tech for the 17th Cen­tury — Suzanne Fis­cher — Tech­nol­ogy — The Atlantic

    “The university’s John Carter Brown Library has long held the “Roger Williams Mys­tery Book,” a book that pur­port­edly belonged to Roger Williams, the rad­i­cal reli­gious thinker and founder of Rhode Island. The book is miss­ing its title page and thus has lit­tle iden­ti­fy­ing infor­ma­tion (besides a sub­ti­tle, “An Essay Con­cern­ing the Rec­on­cil­ing of Dif­fer­ences among Chris­tians”) — but it’s cov­ered with exten­sive short­hand mar­gin­a­lia sus­pected to have been writ­ten by Williams him­self some­time in the mid 1600s. The stu­dents, who include his­tory and math majors, are using this semes­ter to deci­pher the writ­ing and to deter­mine whether or not the short­hand hand­writ­ing was Williams’s hand.”

    nanohis­tory mar­gin­a­lia early-​​modern puz­zles
  • atomo

    “atomo is a small, sim­ple, insanely flex­i­ble and expres­sive pro­gram­ming lan­guage. its design is inspired by Scheme (small, sim­ple core), Slate (mul­ti­ple dis­patch, key­words), Ruby (very DSL-​​friendly), and Erlang (message-​​passing con­cur­rency). it is writ­ten in and pig­gy­backs on the Haskell run­time, per­mit­ting access to all of its power (and libraries!) through a thin layer.”

    pro­gram­ming lan­guage
  • Jour­nal of Dig­i­tal Humanities

    “The Jour­nal of Dig­i­tal Human­i­ties is a com­pre­hen­sive, peer-​​reviewed, open access jour­nal that fea­tures the best schol­ar­ship, tools, and con­ver­sa­tions pro­duced by the dig­i­tal human­i­ties com­mu­nity in the pre­vi­ous quarter.”

    digital-​​humanities jour­nal open-​​access pub­lish­ing
  • [1203.4881] Com­pu­ta­tional Com­plex­ity Analy­sis of Multi-​​Objective Genetic Programming

    Some days I just want to take genetic pro­gram­ming away from the com­puter sci­en­tists. Then I real­ize I ought to just let them keep the use­less, rit­u­al­ized thing they imag­ine it is.

    facepalm multiobjective-​​optimization software-​​development-​​is-​​not-​​programming
  • - How We Will Read: Clay Shirky

    “That is one of the poten­tial shifts in social read­ing: Can I cre­ate value for other peo­ple by say­ing that I found this pas­sage by Bruno LaTour strik­ing — even if I never look at it again? That’s an amaz­ing act of what I called “frozen shar­ing” in my last book. Being gen­er­ous about things when you are offer­ing it out to the pub­lic, with­out it being either in a spe­cific time frame or for a spe­cific target.”

    pub­lish­ing read­ing social-​​capital project be-​​useful-​​to-​​one-​​another

Comments are closed.